Probably the most iconic superhero in the business is Superman and for good reason. He's got an extremely recognizable (near garish...) costume and a symbol that anyone knows from a distance. The S shield is likely even more recognizable than Batman's symbol as it has changed the least since it first débuted in the 1930's. Further, his power set (while rather generic...) is memorable in that many comic book fans think of Superman when the idea of flight, heat vision and the like are brought up. And it is the power set that we shall discuss today; specifically the topic of invulnerability and super strength...
It's no secret that Superman can take most anything thrown at him, be it missiles, super strong opponents, or even meteors. The impact may throw him back a ways, maybe it would even 'hurt' him, but he sustains no real lasting damage (after all, he is The Man of Steel...) unless it is a ridiculous level of damage or the opponent is his match or his better in strength (see Doomsday...). Further, Superman can dish it out as well as he takes a hit. He has shifted tectonic plates, moved the moon, and punched 'reality' so hard that it changed (ok, that was Superboy Prime, but the principle is still sound [and it's ridiculous...]...). It's likely that Superman could honestly solve a majority of the world’s problems by a mere application of force, but he doesn't because of his upstanding, 1950's morality. This level of power also means it is nigh-pointless to have him stopping everyday crime. No one would commit petty crimes with a Superman around (that's for another post altogether...). However, this amount of power and toughness comes into question when we bring in Kryptonian or Kryptonian-esque beings on par (power-wise...) with the Big Blue Boy Scout...
To set the stage, let's say we take a body builder and have him punch a dude who is not a body builder. The guy who got punch will fly back farther than if he had also been a body builder. It's an application of resistance and force; pure physics if you will. Now, let's bring in Superman and an average, comparable Kryptonian (Zod is good...) or Captain Marvel (Shazam for those of you who need clarification...). If a Kryptonian punches something (or somone...) that is not supernaturally tough, the target will go flying. But, using the body builder analogy, Superman should react to a Kryptonian/Shazam punch as if he were a normal guy getting hit by a normal guy. Because of The Man of Steel's inherent toughness, the reaction of his getting sent through the air/through walls/etc. should not occur...
There is a hidden statement when we see Superman take a punch in such a way (and it may be a trifle...). When he gets hit by such a being/force/what have you, not only does his inherent invulnerability become negated, the force of the blow overrides his ability to fly as well. Superman has been shown to be able to turn on a dime and have fine control of his ability to fly, but when he gets hit by such a force, this ability becomes lost until he lands. Afterwards, his flight returns as normal. Again, I realize this is for effect alone and makes combat with Superman better, but by having the Man of Steel react in such a ways makes a statement that has never been explained completely enough for my tastes...
In specialized instances (being surprised, getting hit with a large object with Kryptonian force, etc...) though, I can understand seeing Superman sailing through the air or getting beaten down. It would be similar if someone got sucker punch or knocked a guy out with one punch. And I also understand the need to use such effects in comic books; seeing Superman smashing and getting smashed by a powerful opponent leads to good combat panels and makes a comic that much more exciting. I get it. It would not nearly be as much fun if Superman got punched by Zod and he reacted as if I got punched by, let's say Brian. Not that exciting, really. Now, my knowledge of physics is limited so the original analogy may be flawed due to lack of science know how. However, this is how the subject of invulnerability vs. super strength (with a dash of flight...) is being handled in a not quite believable manner. Prove me wrong, folks...
4 comments:
This is something that's always bothered me as well and I'll go along with issues regarding other super-strongs who get their power from "scientific" sources like Zod with the Sun or Doomsday with eugenics. If a magic person like Capt. Marvel knocks him back I'm willing to buy it though, Supes is notably vulnerable and it's magic so believability and science can be forgotten.
You're expecting consistency from superhero fiction? ;-)
Also, nice subtlety on the title :-)
Capt. Marvel is an interesting problem in this situation. His powers are derived from magic, but he does not have magical fists. His thunderbolt, though, is pure magic. Consider: In Kingdom Come, Supes and Marvel punch each other out all over the place, but it isn't until the Captain 'calls down the thunder' does he really start wrecking Superman's day. Marvel's punches alone can't 'damage' Superman, but pure magic does. There's a decent piece of foreshadowing when Superman cuts himself on Wonder Woman's sword before the big battle...
Not only is it appropriate, my facebook links look like 'The Witte Sayss: If I go crazy...'. Fun to be had all over the place...
Hm. It behooves me to point out that I used only pictures from non-'Main' continuity of Supes getting a beatdown. Strange, yes?
Post a Comment